Skip to content This library is free, offered as dana. If it helps your work, donate here →

This is one of 3,622 free prompts in the penguin tree ai library. Sign up once and the whole library opens, with new prompts by email.

open the library →

Synergy identification & sizing calculator

Systematically identifies and sizes cost synergies (procurement, headcount, facilities, IT, distribution) and revenue synergies (cross-sell, market expansion, pricing) between an acquirer and target, producing a sized…

download .md

Purpose

Convert acquirer and target business inputs into a defensible, line-itemized synergy estimate — separating cost from revenue synergies, sizing each with a dollar range, and attaching a confidence level, cost-to-achieve, and time-to-realize to every line. Replaces the round-number synergy assumption ("we'll find 5% of combined cost") with a bottom-up build a deal committee can interrogate.

When to Use

Invoke this skill when the user asks to:

  • Quantify the synergy value of a specific acquisition or merger
  • Build or pressure-test a synergy case for a deal committee or board
  • Justify a purchase price premium above standalone value
  • Separate credible synergies from aspirational ones before signing
  • Produce integration planning inputs (workstream targets, phasing)
  • Compare synergy potential across multiple acquisition targets

Inputs Required

Before starting, collect:

  • Acquirer profile: Revenue, headcount, gross/operating margin, primary cost categories, geographic and customer footprint
  • Target profile: Same metrics for the target — revenue, headcount, margins, cost structure, footprint
  • Deal thesis: The strategic rationale (scale, adjacency, geographic expansion, capability, consolidation)
  • Overlap map: Where the two businesses overlap — shared suppliers, duplicate functions, common facilities, adjacent or shared customers
  • Combined addressable spend (if available): Procurement categories and approximate spend by category
  • Deal size / EV: Enterprise value or purchase price, to frame synergies as % of deal value
  • Integration constraints: Regulatory limits, retention commitments, union/works-council obligations, carve-out dependencies

If cost-category detail is missing, size using industry-standard cost-mix benchmarks for the sector and flag each estimate as benchmark-derived (lower confidence).

Instructions

Step 1: Frame the Synergy Baseline

Establish what the synergy is measured against before sizing anything:

  • Combined cost base: Sum acquirer + target addressable cost, by category (COGS/procurement, personnel, facilities, IT, SG&A, distribution)
  • Combined revenue base: Sum both revenue lines and identify the customer/product overlap and white space
  • Frame as % of deal value: Total run-rate synergies will be compared to EV — flag if the emerging number exceeds ~40% of EV, a signal the case is over-relying on synergies to justify price

Step 2: Size Cost Synergies by Category

Work each category bottom-up. For every line, produce a low–base–high dollar range, not a point estimate.

Procurement / COGS

  • Identify overlapping spend categories where combined volume unlocks better pricing
  • Typical realizable savings: 3–8% of addressable third-party spend for direct materials; 5–15% for indirect/SG&A categories
  • Higher confidence where both parties buy the same inputs from different vendors

Headcount / Personnel

  • Identify duplicate roles: corporate/G&A functions (finance, HR, legal, IT), overlapping leadership layers, redundant sales coverage in shared territories
  • Size as # of roles × fully-loaded cost; typical corporate overlap removal: 15–30% of combined G&A headcount
  • Explicitly net out roles protected by retention or regulatory commitments

Facilities / Real Estate

  • Identify co-located or redundant offices, plants, warehouses, retail
  • Size as avoided lease/operating cost + any owned-property monetization; net against lease-break and relocation costs
  • Time-to-realize is usually longer here — bind by lease-expiry timing

IT / Systems

  • Consolidation of duplicate platforms (ERP, CRM), license rationalization, data-center/cloud consolidation
  • Size the run-rate saving separately from the (often large) one-time migration cost

Distribution / Logistics / Network

  • Route consolidation, shared distribution centers, freight volume leverage

For each line, capture: run-rate saving range, one-time cost to achieve, confidence (High/Medium/Low), time-to-realize (0–12 / 12–24 / 24–36 months).

Step 3: Size Revenue Synergies by Category

Revenue synergies are inherently lower-confidence than cost synergies — reflect that in confidence labels and discount the base case accordingly.

Cross-Sell

  • Acquirer products into target's customer base and vice versa
  • Size as: relevant customer count × realistic attach rate × per-customer revenue × acquirer margin; keep attach-rate assumptions conservative (single digits in year one)

Market / Geographic Expansion

  • Selling one party's products through the other's channels, sales force, or geographic footprint
  • Size against addressable market entered, ramp curve, and capacity to serve

Pricing / Portfolio

  • Reduced price competition where the two overlapped, or premium capture from a broader bundle
  • Flag antitrust sensitivity explicitly — do not size price increases that assume reduced competition in concentrated markets

Customer Retention / Churn Reduction

  • Any thesis where the combined offering reduces churn — size as retained revenue × margin

Attach the same four fields to each revenue line, plus a dis-synergy check: revenue at risk from customer overlap, channel conflict, or attrition during integration. Subtract dis-synergies explicitly.

Step 4: Apply Confidence Weighting

Produce a risk-adjusted total alongside the gross total:

  • High confidence (typically procurement volume leverage, duplicate G&A removal): count at ~90–100% of base
  • Medium (facilities, IT consolidation, defined cross-sell): count at ~50–70%
  • Low (market expansion, pricing, speculative cross-sell): count at ~20–40%
  • Present both gross run-rate synergies and risk-adjusted run-rate synergies

Step 5: Phase and Net the Value

  • Phase run-rate synergies across Year 1 / Year 2 / Year 3 based on time-to-realize
  • Net against cumulative cost-to-achieve to show the year of positive net contribution and payback period
  • State the total one-time investment required to unlock the run-rate

Output Format

  • Structure: Narrative baseline framing → cost synergy table → revenue synergy table → confidence-weighted summary → phasing schedule
  • Length: 900–1,300 words plus the tables
  • Format: Two sized tables (cost, revenue) — columns: Synergy Line | Run-Rate Range (Low–Base–High) | One-Time Cost | Confidence | Time-to-Realize — followed by a summary table and prose commentary
  • Sections: Synergy Baseline → Cost Synergies (by category) → Revenue Synergies (by category) → Dis-Synergies → Confidence-Weighted Summary → 3-Year Phasing & Payback → Key Risks and Assumptions
  • Tone: Corporate development director — quantitative, skeptical of upside, explicit about assumptions; every number is defensible or flagged

Quality Checklist

Before delivering output, verify:

  • [ ] Cost and revenue synergies are in separate tables, never blended
  • [ ] Every synergy line has all four fields: run-rate range, one-time cost, confidence, time-to-realize
  • [ ] A gross total AND a risk-adjusted total are both shown
  • [ ] Dis-synergies (revenue at risk, integration attrition) are explicitly subtracted, not ignored
  • [ ] Total run-rate synergies are expressed as a % of enterprise value, with a flag if above ~40%
  • [ ] Pricing/market-share synergies carry an antitrust caution where relevant
  • [ ] Every benchmark-derived estimate is labeled as such and given lower confidence

Notes

  • Cost synergies are the credible foundation of most deals; revenue synergies are where deals over-promise — weight the case accordingly and let the committee argue the upside, not the base.
  • The cost-to-achieve is frequently underestimated. A synergy that costs more to realize than it saves in the first two years is a red flag, not a win.
  • If the risk-adjusted synergy total is doing most of the work to justify the premium, the recommendation should be to renegotiate price, not to inflate assumptions.
  • Facilities and IT synergies are real but slow — never phase them into Year 1 unless a specific lease expiry or migration date supports it.

How to use this skill

This file is a Claude Code skill in Anthropic's standard format — markdown with YAML frontmatter at the top.

Installing in Claude Code:

  • ~/.claude/skills/<folder-name>/SKILL.md — auto-loads in every session anywhere on your machine (recommended for skills you'll use across multiple projects)
  • <your-project>/.claude/skills/<folder-name>/SKILL.md — auto-loads only when working in that project (recommended for project-specific skills)

Restart Claude Code or open a new session to register.

Using in Claude.ai, ChatGPT, Gemini, or other AI tools:

  1. Drag this file into a new chat, or copy and paste its contents
  2. Send your task or request as your next message — the AI will apply the skill where it fits

For Claude Code skill details: https://docs.anthropic.com/en/docs/claude-code/skills