Purpose
Turn messy, source-dependent deal information into clean, standardized pipeline entries that slot directly into a corporate development tracker — with consistent field formatting, an assigned deal stage, a fit score, and clearly flagged next actions. Eliminates the manual re-keying and inconsistent record-keeping that makes deal pipelines untrustworthy.
When to Use
Invoke this skill when the user asks to:
- Add a new acquisition target or deal to the pipeline
- Convert meeting notes, an intro call, or a CIM summary into a structured deal record
- Standardize or clean up an existing pipeline entry with missing or inconsistent fields
- Extract deal fields (revenue, EBITDA, ask, sector) from a banker email or teaser
- Assign or update a deal's stage and next action
- Batch-process several raw deal notes into consistent pipeline rows
Inputs Required
Before starting, collect:
- Raw deal input: The unstructured source — meeting notes, CIM/teaser summary, email text, or call recap
- Source type: Where the input came from (inbound banker, proprietary outreach, referral, event, etc.)
- Pipeline field set: The tracker's existing column headers, if the user wants output mapped to their schema
- Stage taxonomy: The user's stage names, if custom (defaults provided below)
- Deal owner: Who on the team owns this target
- Strategic thesis: What the acquirer is trying to accomplish (bolt-on, geographic expansion, capability, roll-up), used for the fit score
If a field set or stage taxonomy isn't provided, use the standard schema and stages below. Never fabricate financials — flag anything not present in the input as "Not disclosed."
Instructions
Step 1: Extract and Normalize Core Fields
Parse the raw input and populate the standard 20-field schema. Normalize formats consistently:
Identification
- Target name: Company legal or trade name
- Website / domain: If available
- Sector / sub-sector: Map to a clean category, not the input's phrasing
- Geography (HQ): City, State/Country
Financials (label "Not disclosed" if absent — never estimate silently)
- Revenue (LTM): Normalize to $M with currency noted
- EBITDA (LTM): Normalize to $M; note if adjusted
- EBITDA margin: Calculate if both revenue and EBITDA are present; otherwise "N/A"
- Growth rate: YoY revenue growth if stated
- Asking price / valuation expectation: Include multiple basis if given (e.g., "~8x EBITDA")
Deal Context
- Deal type: Acquisition / Majority / Minority / Merger / Asset purchase
- Source type: From input
- Referring party / banker: Name and firm if present
- Process type: Proprietary / Limited auction / Broad auction / Unknown
Relationship & Status
- Deal owner: From input
- First contact date: From input or note as unknown
- Last touch date: Most recent interaction referenced
- Key contacts at target: Name + title
Assessment
- Strategic rationale: One sentence tying the target to the acquirer's thesis
- Known risks / flags: Concentration, customer churn, key-person dependency, litigation, etc.
- Notes: Anything material that doesn't fit a field
Step 2: Assign Deal Stage
Map the deal to a stage using signals in the input. Default taxonomy:
- Sourced — Identified; no contact yet
- Initial Contact — Outreach made or inbound received; no substantive discussion
- Qualifying — Exploratory call held; gathering basic info
- NDA / Info Exchange — NDA signed or CIM/teaser received
- Evaluation — Actively reviewing financials; building initial view
- IOI / LOI — Indication or letter of intent stage
- Diligence — Confirmatory diligence underway
- Negotiation / Close — Definitive agreement in progress
- Passed / Dead — Declined or fell through (capture reason)
Choose the stage based on the furthest milestone evidenced in the input, not the most optimistic interpretation.
Step 3: Score Strategic Fit (1–5)
Rate against the stated thesis using a transparent rubric:
- 5 — Core fit: Directly advances the primary thesis; few obvious risks
- 4 — Strong fit: Advances thesis with minor gaps or integration friction
- 3 — Adjacent: Related but not central; requires a rationale to prioritize
- 2 — Opportunistic: Off-thesis but potentially attractive on economics
- 1 — Poor fit: Little strategic logic; likely a pass
State the one factor most driving the score.
Step 4: Flag Next Action and Owner
Based on stage and input, specify:
- Next action: A concrete verb-led step (e.g., "Send NDA," "Schedule management call," "Request 3-year P&L")
- Owner: Who does it
- Target date: If a timeline is referenced or reasonably inferable; otherwise "TBD"
- Priority: High / Medium / Low, aligned to fit score and stage
Step 5: Output the Pipeline Entry
Render the entry in a clean, tracker-ready format. If a custom field set was provided, map to those exact column names and note any fields with no available data. For batch inputs, produce one entry per target.
Output Format
- Structure: One structured table per deal (Field | Value), followed by a short assessment block (Stage rationale, Fit score + driver, Next action)
- Length: 250–400 words per deal entry
- Format: Two-column field table + brief structured notes; a summary table if multiple deals are processed
- Sections: Field Table → Stage Assignment → Fit Score → Next Action Block
- Tone: Corporate development analyst — precise, neutral, no promotional language; financials handled conservatively
Quality Checklist
Before delivering output, verify:
- [ ] All 20 standard fields are present, each with a value or an explicit "Not disclosed"/"Unknown"
- [ ] No financials are estimated or invented — every number traces to the input
- [ ] EBITDA margin is calculated only when both revenue and EBITDA are present
- [ ] Deal stage matches the furthest milestone actually evidenced, not the most favorable read
- [ ] Fit score includes the single driving factor, not just a number
- [ ] Next action is a concrete, owner-assigned step — not a vague status
Notes
- When financials appear in ranges or ranges-with-basis (e.g., "$10–12M revenue, high-single-digit EBITDA margins"), preserve the range rather than picking a point value.
- For inbound banker deals, always capture process type — proprietary vs. broad auction changes prioritization significantly.
- If the input conflicts with itself (e.g., two different revenue figures), surface both and flag the discrepancy in Notes rather than choosing one.
- For batch processing, keep field normalization identical across all entries so the pipeline stays sortable and comparable.
How to use this skill
This file is a Claude Code skill in Anthropic's standard format — markdown with YAML frontmatter at the top.
Installing in Claude Code:
~/.claude/skills/<folder-name>/SKILL.md— auto-loads in every session anywhere on your machine (recommended for skills you'll use across multiple projects)<your-project>/.claude/skills/<folder-name>/SKILL.md— auto-loads only when working in that project (recommended for project-specific skills)
Restart Claude Code or open a new session to register.
Using in Claude.ai, ChatGPT, Gemini, or other AI tools:
- Drag this file into a new chat, or copy and paste its contents
- Send your task or request as your next message — the AI will apply the skill where it fits
For Claude Code skill details: https://docs.anthropic.com/en/docs/claude-code/skills