Skip to content This library is free, offered as dana. If it helps your work, donate here →

This is one of 3,622 free prompts in the penguin tree ai library. Sign up once and the whole library opens, with new prompts by email.

open the library →

Demand signal analyzer

Analyzes demand history alongside market signals and external data to decompose seasonality, trend, and anomalies, then produces a demand signal interpretation with confidence levels, a baseline vs. adjusted demand…

download .md

Purpose

Turn raw demand history and scattered market signals into a clear, defensible interpretation of what demand is actually doing — separating seasonality, underlying trend, and one-off anomalies — and delivering an adjusted demand view with explicit confidence levels so planners know how much to trust each signal before committing to a forecast.

When to Use

Invoke this skill when the user asks to:

  • Interpret demand patterns or decompose a product's demand history
  • Diagnose why a forecast missed and whether it was a signal or noise
  • Identify seasonality, trend shifts, or anomalies in a SKU or category
  • Sense near-term demand changes from promotions, pricing, or market events
  • Prepare a demand signal summary for an S&OP or demand review meeting
  • Reconcile statistical patterns with qualitative field or sales intelligence

Inputs Required

Before starting, collect:

  • Product or category scope: The SKU, product family, or category being analyzed
  • Demand history: Historical demand by period (weekly or monthly), ideally 18–36 months — shipments, orders, or POS/sell-through (note which)
  • History granularity and horizon: Time bucket used and how far forward the interpretation must serve
  • Market signals: Any known qualitative or leading indicators — promotions, price changes, competitor moves, new listings, macro trends, weather, campaigns
  • External data inputs: Any available external series (category demand, search trends, economic indicators, channel data)
  • Known events: Stockouts, one-time bulk orders, data errors, channel shifts, or supply disruptions that distort history
  • Planning objective: What decision this feeds — forecast override, safety stock, buy quantity, or executive review

If granularity or horizon is missing, default to monthly buckets and a 6-month forward interpretation, and state the assumption.

Instructions

Step 1: Data Integrity Check

Before interpreting anything, validate the history is usable.

  • Flag periods affected by stockouts (censored demand — actual demand exceeded what shipped)
  • Flag one-time distortions: bulk orders, channel loads, returns, data errors, duplicate entries
  • Note structural breaks: new product introductions, discontinuations, channel or customer additions, list price resets
  • State whether the series measures true demand (orders/POS) or constrained supply (shipments) — this changes everything downstream
  • Recommend cleansing actions (e.g., "impute stockout months to trend + seasonality") before decomposition

Step 2: Time-Series Decomposition

Separate the signal into its components.

  • Level (baseline): The de-seasonalized, de-trended average demand
  • Trend: Direction and slope — flat, growing, declining, or inflecting. Quantify (e.g., "+3% per month over trailing 6 months" or "trend reversal from +2% to −4% around period X")
  • Seasonality: Identify recurring patterns and estimate seasonal indices per period (e.g., "December runs 1.6x baseline; February 0.7x"). Distinguish true seasonality (repeats across ≥2 cycles) from a one-time spike
  • Residual/noise: What's left after level, trend, and seasonality — high residual variance means low predictability
  • State the decomposition method assumption (additive vs. multiplicative) and why

Step 3: Anomaly Identification

Isolate points that don't fit the pattern.

  • Classify each anomaly as: promotional lift, demand shock (external event), data artifact, supply-constrained (censored), or unexplained
  • For each, estimate magnitude (% or units above/below expected) and whether it is repeating (a new pattern forming) or isolated (noise to exclude)
  • Distinguish anomalies to remove from baseline vs. anomalies that signal a real shift and should be carried forward

Step 4: Qualitative Signal Integration (Demand Sensing)

Reconcile the statistics with market intelligence.

  • Map each provided market signal to an expected demand effect: direction (up/down), magnitude (small/moderate/large), and timing (immediate/lagged/lead)
  • Identify corroboration (qualitative signal confirms the statistical pattern → higher confidence) vs. conflict (field says growth, history says decline → flag for investigation)
  • Weight leading indicators (search trends, competitor exits, pipeline) that the historical series cannot yet reflect

Step 5: Confidence Scoring

Assign an explicit confidence level to the overall interpretation and to each key signal.

  • Use a High / Medium / Low scale with stated drivers:
  • High: ≥2 full seasonal cycles, low residual variance, corroborating qualitative signals, clean data
  • Medium: Partial history, moderate noise, or mixed qualitative signals
  • Low: Short/dirty history, high residual variance, conflicting signals, or a structural break in progress
  • Never present an interpretation without its confidence level and the top 2 reasons behind it

Step 6: Baseline vs. Adjusted Demand View

Produce the actionable output.

  • Baseline: Statistical expectation from level + trend + seasonality, with anomalies removed
  • Adjusted: Baseline modified for validated qualitative signals and forward events, with each adjustment itemized and justified
  • Present as a period-by-period view (table) so the planner sees exactly where and why the adjusted view diverges from baseline

Step 7: Prioritized Planning Actions

Translate interpretation into decisions.

  • List 4–6 actions ranked by impact and urgency (e.g., "raise Q4 forecast +12% for peak seasonality — High confidence"; "investigate conflicting field signal on SKU-X before overriding — Medium")
  • Flag any signal needing more data before action, and specify exactly what data would resolve it

Output Format

  • Structure: Seven sections following the analysis sequence; decomposition and baseline vs. adjusted views presented as tables; actions as a ranked list
  • Length: 900–1,300 words
  • Format: Structured document with tables for seasonal indices and the baseline-vs-adjusted period view; bullets and short prose elsewhere
  • Sections: Data Integrity Check → Decomposition (level/trend/seasonality/residual) → Anomaly Identification → Qualitative Signal Integration → Confidence Scoring → Baseline vs. Adjusted Demand View → Prioritized Planning Actions
  • Tone: Demand planning specialist — quantitative, cautious about noise, explicit about uncertainty, decision-oriented

Quality Checklist

Before delivering output, verify:

  • [ ] Data integrity issues (stockouts, one-time orders, structural breaks) are flagged before any interpretation
  • [ ] Seasonality is quantified with per-period indices, not described vaguely as "seasonal"
  • [ ] Every anomaly is classified (promo / shock / artifact / censored / unexplained) and marked as isolated or repeating
  • [ ] Each key signal and the overall interpretation carry an explicit High/Medium/Low confidence level with stated drivers
  • [ ] Baseline vs. adjusted view is shown period-by-period with each adjustment itemized and justified
  • [ ] Planning actions are ranked by impact and each carries its confidence level

Notes

  • Shipments are not demand — if the series is constrained supply, say so and treat stockout periods as censored, or the trend will be understated
  • Two full seasonal cycles is the practical minimum for trustworthy seasonal indices; with less, downgrade confidence and lean on category or analog data
  • A conflict between statistical history and field intelligence is a finding, not a problem to smooth over — surface it and specify what would resolve it
  • When history is short or noisy, a Medium-confidence adjusted view with a clear investigation action beats a falsely precise number

How to use this skill

This file is a Claude Code skill in Anthropic's standard format — markdown with YAML frontmatter at the top.

Installing in Claude Code:

  • ~/.claude/skills/<folder-name>/SKILL.md — auto-loads in every session anywhere on your machine (recommended for skills you'll use across multiple projects)
  • <your-project>/.claude/skills/<folder-name>/SKILL.md — auto-loads only when working in that project (recommended for project-specific skills)

Restart Claude Code or open a new session to register.

Using in Claude.ai, ChatGPT, Gemini, or other AI tools:

  1. Drag this file into a new chat, or copy and paste its contents
  2. Send your task or request as your next message — the AI will apply the skill where it fits

For Claude Code skill details: https://docs.anthropic.com/en/docs/claude-code/skills