Cultural integration risk evaluator

Purpose

Produce a structured cultural gap analysis between two merging organizations and convert it into a defensible integration approach — preserve, harmonize, or transform — for each cultural dimension. Solves the most common cause of deal value destruction: integration decisions made on financials and org charts while cultural incompatibility goes unmeasured until attrition and productivity collapse reveal it.

When to Use

Invoke this skill when the user asks to:

• Assess culture fit between an acquirer and a target company in an M&A deal
• Diagnose cultural integration risk before or after deal close
• Decide whether to keep the target's culture intact, blend the two, or fully absorb it
• Explain why an integration is stalling on people and behavior, not systems
• Build a culture workstream plan for an integration management office (IMO)
• Brief a deal committee or board on cultural risk and the recommended integration posture

Inputs Required

Before starting, collect:

• Deal context: Acquirer and target names (or descriptors), deal rationale (e.g., scale, capability acquisition, talent, geographic expansion), and stage (pre-LOI, diligence, pre-close, post-close)
• Decision-making style (both sides): Centralized vs. distributed, consensus vs. directive, speed vs. deliberation, data-driven vs. instinct-led
• Organizational structure (both sides): Hierarchy depth, span of control, functional vs. matrixed, degree of formality
• Stated and lived values (both sides): Official values plus what actually gets rewarded and punished
• Communication and work norms (both sides): Meeting culture, written vs. verbal, remote/hybrid/in-office, pace and hours
• Employee experience signals (both sides): Engagement scores, attrition rates, Glassdoor themes, tenure, comp philosophy if available
• Integration constraints: Target retention priorities (key talent to keep), synergy timeline, and any non-negotiables (e.g., systems consolidation deadlines)

If quantitative signals (engagement, attrition) are missing for one side, proceed qualitatively and flag the dimension as lower-confidence.

Instructions

Step 1: Establish the Integration Thesis

State, in two sentences, why the deal exists and what cultural outcome would protect its value. Classify the deal archetype, because it dictates the default integration posture:

• Absorption (acquirer scales an existing capability): bias toward transform
• Capability/talent acquisition (the people are the asset): bias toward preserve
• Merger of equals / platform build: bias toward harmonize Name the archetype explicitly — it anchors every later recommendation.

Step 2: Score the Six Cultural Dimensions

For each dimension, characterize both organizations, then rate the gap on a 1–5 scale (1 = aligned, 5 = fundamentally opposed). Note directionality (which side is more X).

Dimension 1 — Decision-Making Style Centralization, consensus vs. directive, speed, and risk appetite. The single highest-friction dimension in most integrations — clashing decision speed kills momentum first.

Dimension 2 — Organizational Structure & Power Hierarchy depth, formality, where authority actually sits. A flat target absorbed into a deep hierarchy predicts senior-talent flight.

Dimension 3 — Values (Stated vs. Lived) Compare official values and what behavior is actually rewarded. Gaps between stated and lived values on either side are a credibility risk during integration messaging.

Dimension 4 — Communication Norms Written vs. verbal, transparency, meeting cadence, formality. Drives day-one collaboration friction.

Dimension 5 — Work Style & Pace Hours, location model, urgency, autonomy vs. process. Often the most emotionally charged for rank-and-file employees.

Dimension 6 — Employee Experience & Identity Engagement, attrition trend, pride, comp/recognition philosophy, attachment to the brand. Indicates how much change the target's people can absorb before they leave.

Step 3: Calculate Composite Risk

Sum the six gap scores (range 6–30) and translate:

• 6–12 — Low risk: cultures are broadly compatible
• 13–20 — Moderate risk: integration is workable with active management
• 21–30 — High risk: cultural incompatibility threatens deal value; integration pace must slow Then identify the two highest-gap dimensions as the primary risk drivers and the two lowest-gap dimensions as integration anchors to lead with.

Step 4: Recommend an Approach Per Dimension

For each of the six dimensions, assign one approach, justified by the gap score and the deal archetype:

• Preserve: keep the target's way — when it's a source of value or the gap is small and the target's approach is healthier
• Harmonize: deliberately blend both into a new norm — when both sides have legitimate strengths
• Transform: move to the acquirer's standard — when scale, compliance, or systems require one way For each, state the why and the cost of getting it wrong.

Step 5: Build the 100-Day Cultural Action Sequence

Sequence actions by phase, tied to the highest-risk dimensions first:

• Days 0–30 — Stabilize: retention conversations with named key talent, leadership alignment on the archetype and posture, transparent communication of what will and won't change
• Days 31–60 — Diagnose & decide: validate the gap assessment with on-the-ground listening (skip-levels, pulse survey), finalize per-dimension approaches, name culture owners
• Days 61–100 — Activate: roll out harmonize/transform changes in priority order, install integration rituals, set the leading indicators to monitor (attrition of key talent, engagement delta, decision cycle time)

Step 6: Flag Watch Items and Confidence

List the assumptions made where data was thin, the dimensions rated low-confidence, and the top three early-warning signals that the integration is going wrong.

Output Format

• Structure: Integration thesis and archetype up top; a six-row dimension table (organization-A profile, organization-B profile, gap score, directionality); composite risk score with interpretation; per-dimension approach recommendations; 100-day phased sequence; watch items
• Length: 1,100–1,500 words
• Format: Structured document with one scoring table; the rest in labeled sections with tight bullets
• Sections: Integration Thesis & Archetype → Six-Dimension Gap Table → Composite Risk Score → Per-Dimension Approach (Preserve/Harmonize/Transform) → 100-Day Action Sequence → Watch Items & Confidence
• Tone: Integration director briefing a deal committee — measured, evidence-anchored, decisive on recommendations; names risk plainly without alarmism

Quality Checklist

Before delivering output, verify:

• [ ] All six dimensions are scored 1–5 with both organizations characterized — none left as a single composite
• [ ] The composite score is summed correctly (6–30) and mapped to the right risk band
• [ ] Each dimension receives exactly one approach (Preserve, Harmonize, or Transform) with a stated rationale
• [ ] Per-dimension approaches are consistent with the deal archetype named in Step 1
• [ ] The two highest-gap dimensions are explicitly addressed first in the 100-day sequence
• [ ] Low-confidence dimensions and assumptions are flagged, not silently treated as certain

Notes

• The deal archetype is the most important input — a "preserve" call in a talent acquisition is the difference between keeping the asset and watching it walk out within a year.
• Resist the instinct to transform everything for the sake of consistency; over-integration destroys more deal value than under-integration in capability and talent deals.
• The gap between an organization's stated and lived values is often more predictive of integration friction than the gap between the two companies — weight it accordingly.
• If engagement or attrition data is unavailable, the assessment is still useful, but say so plainly and recommend a pulse survey in Days 0–30 to close the gap.

How to use this skill

This file is a Claude Code skill in Anthropic's standard format — markdown with YAML frontmatter at the top.

Installing in Claude Code:

• ~/.claude/skills/<folder-name>/SKILL.md — auto-loads in every session anywhere on your machine (recommended for skills you'll use across multiple projects)
• <your-project>/.claude/skills/<folder-name>/SKILL.md — auto-loads only when working in that project (recommended for project-specific skills)

Restart Claude Code or open a new session to register.

Using in Claude.ai, ChatGPT, Gemini, or other AI tools:

1. Drag this file into a new chat, or copy and paste its contents
2. Send your task or request as your next message — the AI will apply the skill where it fits

For Claude Code skill details: https://docs.anthropic.com/en/docs/claude-code/skills