Skip to content This library is free, offered as dana. If it helps your work, donate here →

This is one of 3,622 free prompts in the penguin tree ai library. Sign up once and the whole library opens, with new prompts by email.

open the library →

Crypto derivatives risk explainer

Produces a structured internal explainer that demystifies a specific crypto derivatives instrument or risk event — covering instrument mechanics, leverage and margin math, funding rate dynamics, basis behavior…

download .md

Purpose

Produce a precise, decision-ready explainer that takes a crypto derivatives concept — a perpetual swap, a leverage tier change, a funding spike, a basis blowout, or a liquidation cascade — and translates it into the mechanics, the math, and the concrete risk exposures it creates for the platform and its users. Closes the gap between desk-level fluency and the working understanding a risk, compliance, or product owner needs to set policy.

When to Use

Invoke this skill when the user asks to:

  • Explain how perpetual swaps, funding rates, or mark price work to a non-trading stakeholder
  • Walk through what happens during a liquidation cascade and how the insurance fund and auto-deleveraging interact
  • Clarify leverage tiers, initial vs. maintenance margin, and how margin calls trigger
  • Explain a basis dislocation between perp price and spot/index and what it signals
  • Brief compliance or product on the risk exposures a derivatives feature introduces before launch
  • Post-mortem a specific market event (funding spike, liquidation wipeout, basis break) for internal review

Inputs Required

Before starting, collect:

  • Topic or instrument: The specific concept or event to explain (e.g., perpetual swaps, funding rate spike, ADL event)
  • Audience: Who reads this — risk manager, compliance officer, product manager, or exec/board
  • Decision context: What the reader needs to decide or do after reading (set a leverage cap, approve a launch, file a report, etc.)
  • Platform model: Whether this is for the platform's own product, a competitor analysis, or general education
  • Existing knowledge level: Beginner / intermediate — how much crypto-native vocabulary can be assumed
  • Specific event details (if event-driven): Date, instrument, price levels, funding numbers, or liquidation figures involved
  • Risk lens priority: Which exposure matters most — counterparty, market, operational, liquidity, or regulatory

If audience or decision context is missing, default to a risk manager who needs to set or revise a policy, and note the assumption.

Instructions

Step 1: Frame the Instrument or Event

Open with a 2–3 sentence plain-language definition of the topic, then anchor it with one concrete numerical example using realistic figures. Do not assume crypto-native vocabulary unless the input specifies intermediate knowledge — define terms like mark price, index price, funding, and maintenance margin on first use.

State explicitly: what this instrument or event is, what it is NOT (a common misconception to clear), and why a risk/compliance/product reader should care.

Step 2: Explain the Mechanics with Math

Break the topic into its working parts and show the arithmetic. Match the breakdown to the topic:

For perpetual swaps: Define the perp vs. dated future distinction, the role of mark price vs. last traded price, and how the contract stays tethered to spot via funding. Show a worked funding payment: position notional × funding rate × interval.

For leverage and margin: Show initial margin, maintenance margin, and the liquidation price formula. Walk one position from entry → margin call threshold → liquidation with actual numbers. Explain leverage tiers (margin requirement rising as position size grows) and why they exist.

For funding mechanics: Show how the funding rate is computed (premium/interest components), the funding interval, and who pays whom in contango vs. backwardation. Demonstrate how a sustained positive funding rate creates a carrying cost that can force position exits.

For basis dislocations: Define basis (perp − index, or future − spot), show how it's expressed in annualized terms, and explain what a widening or inverting basis signals about leverage, sentiment, and liquidity stress.

For liquidation events: Walk the cascade: a price move pushes positions to liquidation price → forced liquidations sell into the move → price drops further → more liquidations. Explain the role of the insurance fund, socialized loss / clawback, and auto-deleveraging (ADL) as backstops, and the order in which they engage.

Step 3: Map the Risk Exposures

Translate mechanics into concrete platform and user risk. For each relevant lens, state the exposure, the trigger condition, and the magnitude driver:

  • Market risk: Where price moves create losses and how leverage amplifies them
  • Counterparty / platform risk: Where the platform absorbs loss (insurance fund depletion, bad debt, ADL on profitable accounts)
  • Liquidity risk: Thin order books amplifying liquidation cascades and slippage
  • Operational risk: Oracle/index manipulation, mark price gaming, system latency during volatility spikes
  • Regulatory / compliance risk: Leverage limits, retail suitability, disclosure obligations, jurisdiction-specific bans

Prioritize the lens named in the inputs; cover the others briefly.

Step 4: Surface the Decision Implications

Connect the explanation directly to the reader's decision context. Provide 3–5 specific implications framed for action — e.g., "A maintenance margin set at X% means a Y% adverse move liquidates the position; setting it lower transfers risk to the insurance fund." Each implication should name a lever the reader controls.

Step 5: Provide Watch Signals and Thresholds

List the concrete numbers and conditions that should trigger attention: funding rate magnitudes, basis spreads, insurance fund balance ratios, liquidation volume spikes, frequency thresholds. Give realistic threshold ranges, not vague guidance.

Output Format

  • Structure: Definition → Mechanics with worked math → Risk exposure map → Decision implications → Watch signals
  • Length: 800–1,200 words
  • Format: Structured document with clear section headers; worked examples set off as labeled calculations; risk exposures and watch signals as scannable lists or a short table
  • Sections: What It Is (and Isn't) → How It Works (with math) → Risk Exposures → What This Means for Your Decision → Watch Signals & Thresholds
  • Tone: Risk officer briefing — precise, sober, numerate, free of hype or trading-floor swagger. Defines jargon, never assumes it.

Quality Checklist

Before delivering output, verify:

  • [ ] At least one worked numerical example with realistic figures is included for the core mechanic
  • [ ] Every crypto-native term is defined on first use (mark price, funding, maintenance margin, ADL, basis)
  • [ ] Risk exposures are tied to specific trigger conditions — not listed as abstract categories
  • [ ] Decision implications each name a concrete lever the reader controls
  • [ ] Watch signals include specific threshold ranges, not "monitor closely"
  • [ ] The explanation states what the topic is NOT (a misconception cleared), not only what it is

Notes

  • Liquidation cascades are the highest-stakes topic for most platform readers — the insurance fund and ADL backstop logic is where risk and product decisions actually live, so default to extra depth there when relevant.
  • Funding rate and basis explainers are most useful when the worked example uses a sustained period (e.g., funding paid every 8 hours over several days) so the reader feels the compounding carry cost.
  • When the request is event-driven (a post-mortem), lead with the timeline of what happened before explaining the mechanics — the reader needs the narrative anchor first.
  • Keep regulatory commentary descriptive of risk categories; this is not legal advice and should flag where formal legal/compliance review is required.

How to use this skill

This file is a Claude Code skill in Anthropic's standard format — markdown with YAML frontmatter at the top.

Installing in Claude Code:

  • ~/.claude/skills/<folder-name>/SKILL.md — auto-loads in every session anywhere on your machine (recommended for skills you'll use across multiple projects)
  • <your-project>/.claude/skills/<folder-name>/SKILL.md — auto-loads only when working in that project (recommended for project-specific skills)

Restart Claude Code or open a new session to register.

Using in Claude.ai, ChatGPT, Gemini, or other AI tools:

  1. Drag this file into a new chat, or copy and paste its contents
  2. Send your task or request as your next message — the AI will apply the skill where it fits

For Claude Code skill details: https://docs.anthropic.com/en/docs/claude-code/skills