Purpose
Evaluate competing cross-border deal structures side-by-side for total tax cost and risk — modeling withholding tax leakage, treaty eligibility, Pillar Two top-up exposure, CFC inclusions, and repatriation friction — so the deal team can choose a structure with a defensible effective tax rate rather than discovering tax leakage after signing.
When to Use
Invoke this skill when the user asks to:
- Compare holding company jurisdiction options for a cross-border acquisition
- Reduce withholding tax leakage on dividend, interest, or royalty flows between deal entities
- Stress-test an existing structure against Pillar Two (GloBE) top-up tax
- Plan post-acquisition financing, IP placement, or repatriation of foreign earnings
- Assess CFC / Subpart F / GILTI exposure from a proposed entity chain
- Confirm whether a proposed holding entity will survive treaty limitation-on-benefits and principal-purpose tests
Inputs Required
Before starting, collect:
- Deal jurisdictions: Acquirer parent country, target country, and any intermediate holding jurisdictions under consideration
- Structure options to compare: 2–4 candidate structures (e.g., direct acquisition vs. Netherlands holdco vs. Luxembourg holdco vs. Singapore holdco)
- Cash flow profile: Expected annual dividends, intercompany interest, and royalty flows by entity, with approximate amounts
- Acquisition financing: Equity vs. debt mix, where debt sits, and intended interest rate
- Target financials: Approximate revenue, profit, and effective tax rate of the target group
- IP and substance: Where key IP sits, where people/functions are located, and substance available in each candidate jurisdiction
- Group Pillar Two status: Whether the combined group exceeds the €750M consolidated revenue threshold
If cash flow amounts are unknown, model on a per-€100 of flow basis and flag the assumption. If Pillar Two status is unstated, assume the group is in scope and note it.
Instructions
Step 1: Map the Entity Chain and Income Flows
For each candidate structure, diagram the ownership chain from ultimate parent to operating target, then trace each income type along the chain:
- Dividends: Operating co → holdco → parent
- Interest: Where acquisition/intercompany debt sits and the payor/payee jurisdictions
- Royalties: IP-owning entity → licensee entities Note for each flow the source jurisdiction, recipient jurisdiction, and the applicable treaty (if any).
Step 2: Calculate Withholding Tax Leakage by Flow
For each income flow in each structure:
- Identify the domestic statutory withholding rate at source
- Apply the applicable treaty reduced rate (dividend, interest, royalty articles often differ)
- For EU intra-group flows, assess Parent-Subsidiary Directive (dividends) and Interest & Royalties Directive eligibility (0% where conditions met)
- Estimate total WHT leakage per structure as a percentage of gross flow Flag any flow where treaty access is uncertain (proceeds to Step 3).
Step 3: Test Treaty Eligibility and Anti-Avoidance
For every treaty rate relied upon:
- Limitation on Benefits (LOB): Does the recipient meet a qualifying-person test (ownership, active trade, derivative benefits)?
- Principal Purpose Test (PPT) under the MLI: Is obtaining the treaty benefit "one of the principal purposes" of the arrangement? A holdco with no commercial substance fails here.
- Beneficial ownership: Is the recipient the beneficial owner, or a conduit? Rate each relied-upon treaty benefit: Secure / Defensible-with-substance / At risk.
Step 4: Model Pillar Two (GloBE) Top-Up Exposure
If the group is in scope (€750M+ consolidated revenue):
- Estimate the GloBE effective tax rate per jurisdiction (covered taxes ÷ GloBE income), accounting for the substance-based income exclusion (payroll + tangible assets carve-out)
- Identify jurisdictions where the jurisdictional ETR falls below 15% → top-up tax applies
- Determine collection mechanism: IIR at parent, UTPR, or a local QDMTT (which generally takes priority)
- Flag structures whose low-tax holdco generates a top-up that erases the WHT savings — a common trap with treaty-shopping holdcos in low-tax jurisdictions
Step 5: Assess CFC / Subpart F / GILTI Inclusions
For the parent-country regime:
- Identify which entities are controlled foreign corporations
- Determine whether passive income (dividends, interest, royalties routed through the holdco) triggers a current inclusion at the parent (Subpart F, GILTI, or EU/UK CFC rules)
- Note interaction with Pillar Two — current CFC inclusions can be credited and affect GloBE covered taxes
- Flag structures where intercompany passive income is taxed currently regardless of repatriation
Step 6: Evaluate Repatriation and Exit
For each structure:
- Cost to move cash from operating co to parent (cumulative WHT through the chain)
- Participation exemption availability at intermediate and parent levels (dividend and capital gains exemption)
- Future exit: capital gains on disposal of the holdco vs. the operating co, and exit/divestment WHT
- Cash trap risk: earnings that are taxable to repatriate but stuck if left offshore
Step 7: Build the Comparative Structure Matrix and Recommend
Assemble a side-by-side matrix (structures as columns, dimensions as rows). Compute an estimated all-in effective tax cost for each structure combining WHT leakage + Pillar Two top-up + CFC inclusions, net of exemptions. Rank the structures and make one clear recommendation with the single biggest risk to monitor.
Output Format
- Structure: Narrative walkthrough of Steps 1–6 per structure, then a comparative matrix, then a ranked recommendation
- Length: 1,100–1,500 words plus the matrix
- Format: Structured analysis with a comparative table (matrix); bullet detail under each dimension
- Sections: Entity chain & flows → WHT leakage → Treaty/anti-avoidance ratings → Pillar Two exposure → CFC inclusions → Repatriation & exit → Comparative structure matrix → Ranked recommendation
- Tour matrix columns: One per candidate structure; rows for WHT leakage %, treaty security rating, jurisdictional GloBE ETR & top-up, CFC inclusion risk, repatriation cost, estimated all-in ETR, overall rank
- Tone: International tax director — precise, conservative on risk, decision-oriented; cites the specific rule or test driving each conclusion
Quality Checklist
Before delivering output, verify:
- [ ] Every income flow (dividends, interest, royalties) is traced through each structure with a source rate, treaty rate, and resulting leakage
- [ ] Each relied-upon treaty benefit carries an explicit Secure / Defensible / At risk rating tied to LOB or PPT reasoning
- [ ] Pillar Two analysis states the jurisdictional GloBE ETR and whether a sub-15% top-up applies — not a generic "consider Pillar Two"
- [ ] The comparative matrix shows an estimated all-in effective tax cost for every structure (countable, comparable figures)
- [ ] CFC/GILTI/Subpart F inclusion risk is assessed for the specific parent-country regime, not assumed away
- [ ] A single ranked recommendation is made with the top monitoring risk named — no hedging
Notes
- The most common failure mode is a holdco that wins on WHT but loses on Pillar Two: a 0% treaty dividend routed through a low-tax holdco can trigger a top-up that exceeds the WHT saved. Always net these against each other.
- Substance is now the load-bearing assumption — PPT, CFC active-income tests, and the GloBE substance carve-out all reward real people and functions. A structure that depends on a letterbox holdco should be rated At risk regardless of treaty text.
- These are directional estimates for structure selection, not filing positions. Recommend local-country counsel confirmation on any treaty benefit rated Defensible or At risk, and a QDMTT check in each operating jurisdiction before signing.
How to use this skill
This file is a Claude Code skill in Anthropic's standard format — markdown with YAML frontmatter at the top.
Installing in Claude Code:
~/.claude/skills/<folder-name>/SKILL.md— auto-loads in every session anywhere on your machine (recommended for skills you'll use across multiple projects)<your-project>/.claude/skills/<folder-name>/SKILL.md— auto-loads only when working in that project (recommended for project-specific skills)
Restart Claude Code or open a new session to register.
Using in Claude.ai, ChatGPT, Gemini, or other AI tools:
- Drag this file into a new chat, or copy and paste its contents
- Send your task or request as your next message — the AI will apply the skill where it fits
For Claude Code skill details: https://docs.anthropic.com/en/docs/claude-code/skills