Skip to content This library is free, offered as dana. If it helps your work, donate here →

This is one of 3,622 free prompts in the penguin tree ai library. Sign up once and the whole library opens, with new prompts by email.

open the library →

Cloud TCO calculator

Calculates a full total cost of ownership comparison between on-premises infrastructure and cloud, covering compute, storage, networking, licensing, labor, facilities, and migration costs, with 3-year and 5-year…

download .md

Purpose

Produce a defensible, line-item TCO comparison between running workloads on existing on-premises infrastructure and migrating to cloud — capturing the hidden costs both models tend to obscure (labor, facilities, refresh cycles, migration, egress) — so finance and infrastructure leaders can make and justify a multi-year decision. Delivers 3-year and 5-year totals with low/base/high sensitivity ranges rather than a single misleading number.

When to Use

Invoke this skill when the user asks to:

  • Build a cloud migration business case or cost justification
  • Compare the cost of staying on-prem versus moving to AWS, Azure, or GCP
  • Calculate total cost of ownership for infrastructure over 3 or 5 years
  • Justify an infrastructure decision to a CFO, board, or finance team
  • Evaluate whether a hardware refresh is worth it versus migrating
  • Model the break-even point of a cloud transition

Inputs Required

Before starting, collect:

  • On-prem compute inventory: Server count, CPU cores, RAM, and approximate utilization (e.g., 40 servers, 640 cores, avg 25% utilization)
  • Storage footprint: Total capacity in TB, storage type (SAN/NAS/local), and annual growth rate
  • Workload profile: Steady-state vs. bursty, dev/test vs. production, uptime requirement, data egress volume per month
  • Software licensing: Key licenses (OS, database, virtualization, middleware) and current annual cost or licensing model (per-core, per-socket, subscription)
  • Labor and staffing: FTE count supporting infrastructure and fully loaded annual cost per FTE
  • Facilities and hardware costs: Data center/colocation spend, power/cooling, and hardware refresh cycle (typically 4–5 years) with replacement cost
  • Target cloud provider and region: AWS/Azure/GCP and primary region, plus any committed-use discount appetite (on-demand, 1yr, 3yr reserved/savings plan)

If cloud provider, utilization, or growth rate are unknown, use these defaults and state them: AWS us-east-1, 30% on-prem utilization, 15% annual storage growth, 5-year hardware refresh, 3-year reserved instance pricing for steady-state workloads.

Instructions

Step 1: Establish the On-Prem Baseline (Annual Run Rate)

Calculate the fully loaded annual cost of the current environment across seven cost categories:

  • Hardware/amortization: Total hardware acquisition cost ÷ refresh cycle years. Include servers, storage arrays, and networking gear. If mid-cycle, note the impending refresh event.
  • Facilities: Colocation or data center space, plus power and cooling. Estimate at $150–$400/kW/month if not provided, sized to rack/power draw.
  • Software licensing: Annualized cost of OS, hypervisor, database, and middleware. Flag per-core licenses that inflate with cloud vCPU counts.
  • Labor: FTE count × fully loaded cost, allocated to the portion of infrastructure being modeled. Default to 40% of a senior sysadmin's time per ~20 physical servers if not provided.
  • Networking/bandwidth: ISP/transit, load balancers, firewalls.
  • Backup/DR: Secondary site, backup storage, DR software and testing.
  • Maintenance/support: Vendor support contracts, warranties, spare parts.

Sum to an on-prem annual run rate. Note any one-time refresh CapEx events that fall inside the 3- and 5-year windows.

Step 2: Right-Size the Cloud Equivalent

Do not lift-and-shift core-for-core. Adjust for cloud realities:

  • Compute mapping: Map on-prem cores to cloud instance families accounting for utilization. Over-provisioned on-prem (25–30% utilization) typically maps to 40–60% fewer cloud vCPUs when right-sized.
  • Commitment model: Apply reserved instance / savings plan discounts (typically 30–55% off on-demand for 1–3yr commitments) to steady-state workloads; keep bursty/dev-test on on-demand or spot.
  • Storage tiering: Map to hot/cool/archive tiers. Do not price all storage at premium SSD rates.
  • Managed services offset: Note where cloud managed databases or services reduce labor and licensing (e.g., managed DB removes DBA hours and some licensing).

Step 3: Build the Cloud Annual Run Rate

Calculate cloud recurring cost across categories:

  • Compute: Right-sized instances × commitment pricing × hours/year
  • Storage: Tiered capacity × per-GB rates, grown by annual growth rate
  • Networking/egress: Data egress volume × egress rates (this is frequently underestimated — call it out explicitly)
  • Licensing (cloud): BYOL vs. license-included; flag per-core licensing that scales with vCPU
  • Cloud labor: Reduced but not eliminated — estimate 60–75% of on-prem FTE hours for equivalent operations, plus any new FinOps/cloud engineering
  • Support plan: Provider support tier (e.g., Business/Enterprise support at 3–10% of spend)

Step 4: Model One-Time Migration Costs

Migration is a cost the on-prem case does not carry — include it in Year 0/Year 1:

  • Assessment and planning: Discovery, dependency mapping, architecture
  • Migration labor: Internal FTE time + external SI/partner fees, sized by workload count and complexity (rehost < replatform < refactor)
  • Dual-running overlap: Period where both environments run simultaneously (typically 2–6 months)
  • Data transfer: Ingress is usually free; account for physical transfer appliances for large datasets
  • Training and tooling: Team upskilling, new monitoring/FinOps tooling

Step 5: Assemble 3-Year and 5-Year TCO

Build a side-by-side table. On-prem cumulative = (annual run rate × years) + any refresh CapEx event inside the window. Cloud cumulative = (annual run rate × years) + one-time migration costs. Calculate:

  • 3-year total, on-prem vs. cloud, with dollar and % delta
  • 5-year total, on-prem vs. cloud, with dollar and % delta
  • Break-even point: The month/year at which cumulative cloud cost crosses below cumulative on-prem cost (or note if it never does within 5 years)

Step 6: Apply Sensitivity Ranges

Produce low / base / high scenarios by flexing the three variables that move the result most:

  • Cloud utilization/right-sizing efficiency (±20%)
  • Committed-use discount realization (assume full commitment vs. partial adoption)
  • Storage/egress growth rate (base growth vs. accelerated)

Present each scenario's 5-year cloud total so the reader sees the realistic band, not a false-precision single figure.

Step 7: Recommendation and Caveats

State a clear recommendation grounded in the numbers. Note the top 3 assumptions that, if wrong, would change the conclusion, and what to validate before committing budget.

Output Format

  • Structure: Narrative summary → on-prem baseline table → cloud run-rate table → migration cost table → 3yr/5yr comparison table → sensitivity scenario table → recommendation
  • Length: 900–1,300 words plus tables
  • Format: Structured document with markdown tables for all cost breakdowns; prose for diagnosis and recommendation
  • Sections: Executive Summary → On-Prem Baseline → Cloud Run Rate → Migration Costs → 3-Year & 5-Year TCO → Sensitivity Analysis (Low/Base/High) → Break-Even → Recommendation & Assumptions to Validate
  • Tone: FinOps analyst reporting to a CFO — precise, numeric, no hype; every figure traceable to an input or a stated assumption

Quality Checklist

Before delivering output, verify:

  • [ ] All seven on-prem cost categories are itemized (hardware, facilities, licensing, labor, networking, backup/DR, maintenance)
  • [ ] Cloud compute is right-sized against utilization — not a 1:1 core-for-core lift with no reduction
  • [ ] Migration one-time costs appear in the cloud case but not the on-prem case
  • [ ] Any hardware refresh CapEx event inside the 3yr/5yr window is included in the on-prem total
  • [ ] Egress costs are explicitly line-itemed, not folded silently into networking
  • [ ] Sensitivity table shows distinct low/base/high 5-year totals, not one number ± a percentage
  • [ ] Every assumption used in place of a missing input is stated explicitly

Notes

  • The two costs most often understated are on-prem labor/facilities (making cloud look worse) and cloud egress/right-sizing failure (making cloud look better) — model both honestly or the comparison is worthless.
  • Cloud rarely wins on pure infrastructure cost for steady, predictable, high-utilization workloads; it wins on elasticity, avoided refresh CapEx, labor reduction, and opportunity cost. Make sure the recommendation reflects which of these actually apply.
  • If the on-prem environment faces an imminent hardware refresh, that CapEx event is often the single largest swing factor — surface it prominently.
  • Encourage the user to validate compute right-sizing with 2–4 weeks of actual utilization telemetry before committing budget, since it is the highest-variance input in the model.

How to use this skill

This file is a Claude Code skill in Anthropic's standard format — markdown with YAML frontmatter at the top.

Installing in Claude Code:

  • ~/.claude/skills/<folder-name>/SKILL.md — auto-loads in every session anywhere on your machine (recommended for skills you'll use across multiple projects)
  • <your-project>/.claude/skills/<folder-name>/SKILL.md — auto-loads only when working in that project (recommended for project-specific skills)

Restart Claude Code or open a new session to register.

Using in Claude.ai, ChatGPT, Gemini, or other AI tools:

  1. Drag this file into a new chat, or copy and paste its contents
  2. Send your task or request as your next message — the AI will apply the skill where it fits

For Claude Code skill details: https://docs.anthropic.com/en/docs/claude-code/skills