Purpose
Turn a list of target countries into a structured statutory benefits compliance map — surfacing mandatory benefits, legally required leave, employer social contributions, and the tax treatment of common benefits per jurisdiction — so a global benefits team can scope obligations, budget employer costs, and flag compliance risk before hiring or standardizing a program.
When to Use
Invoke this skill when the user asks to:
- Understand statutory benefits obligations for hiring in new countries
- Map mandated leave (annual, sick, parental, public holidays) across jurisdictions
- Compare employer social security and payroll contribution rates across countries
- Check how common benefits (health, pension, stipends, equity) are taxed in each market
- Standardize or harmonize a global benefits program across multiple countries
- Audit an existing multinational benefits setup for statutory gaps
Inputs Required
Before starting, collect:
- Countries: The list of jurisdictions to map
- Employment model: Direct entity, EOR/PEO, or contractor — obligations differ sharply
- Headcount per country: Rough numbers (some thresholds trigger additional obligations)
- Existing benefits offered: Current global or regional benefits, if any
- Priority markets: Which countries are hiring-imminent vs. exploratory
- Comparison focus: Cost, compliance risk, competitiveness, or leave generosity
If employment model is unspecified, assume direct entity and note that EOR arrangements shift some liability to the provider. Flag throughout that statutory rules change frequently and local counsel should confirm before contracts are signed.
Instructions
Step 1: Build a Per-Country Compliance Profile
For each country provided, produce a profile with these six blocks:
1. Mandatory Statutory Benefits
- Employer-required benefits (state pension enrollment, health insurance, unemployment insurance, work injury/accident cover)
- Note whether each is a public-scheme contribution or a required private benefit
- Flag any benefit that is technically voluntary but a de facto market standard (e.g., supplementary private health where public systems are thin)
2. Mandated Leave List the statutory minimum for each, in days or weeks:
- Annual/vacation leave (and whether public holidays are separate or included)
- Public holidays (count)
- Sick leave (duration, and who pays — employer vs. state)
- Maternity / paternity / parental leave (duration, pay level, funding source)
- Other statutory leave (bereavement, marriage, care leave) where materially relevant
3. Employer Social Contributions
- Total approximate employer contribution rate as a % of gross salary
- Break down the major components (pension, health, unemployment, injury) at a high level
- Note any wage ceilings or floors that cap contributions
- Label the figure as an approximate rate that varies by salary band and region
4. Tax Treatment of Common Benefits For the benefits the buyer offers or is likely to offer (health, pension top-ups, meal/transport stipends, equity, wellness), state:
- Whether it is taxable to the employee, tax-advantaged, or exempt
- Whether it is deductible to the employer
- Any reporting or benefit-in-kind valuation obligation
5. Notable Thresholds & Traps
- Headcount, tenure, or salary thresholds that trigger new obligations (e.g., works councils, mandatory bonuses/13th-month pay, severance accrual)
- 13th/14th month salary requirements where they exist
- Probation, notice, and severance rules that interact with benefits
6. Top 3 Compliance Risks The three most likely ways this buyer trips up in this jurisdiction, each with a one-line mitigation.
Step 2: Build the Cross-Country Comparison Matrix
Create a single table with countries as rows and these columns:
- Employer contribution rate (approx %)
- Annual leave (days)
- Public holidays (count)
- Paid parental leave (weeks, top-line)
- 13th-month required? (Y/N)
- Statutory severance? (Y/N)
- Compliance risk level (Low / Medium / High)
This lets the buyer scan relative cost and complexity at a glance.
Step 3: Prioritized Action List
Rank the countries by combined cost and compliance complexity, then produce a numbered action list:
- Which markets are lowest-friction to hire in first
- Which require entity setup, local advisor, or EOR before proceeding
- Specific gaps in the buyer's existing benefits vs. each country's statutory floor
- Where standardization is feasible vs. where local carve-outs are mandatory
Step 4: Standardization Guidance
Close with practical guidance on where a global benefits program can be harmonized (typically supplementary/perk benefits) versus where it must remain country-specific (statutory floors, leave, contributions), so the buyer can design a "global core + local compliance" structure.
Output Format
- Structure: One profile per country (six labeled blocks each) → cross-country comparison matrix → prioritized action list → standardization guidance
- Length: 200–350 words per country profile; total scales with country count (typically 1,500–2,500 words for 5–8 countries)
- Format: Structured profiles with labeled sub-sections; comparison rendered as a table; action list numbered
- Sections: Per-Country Profiles → Comparison Matrix → Prioritized Action List → Standardization Guidance
- Tone: Global benefits director — precise, obligation-focused, risk-aware; states facts plainly and flags uncertainty rather than overstating
Quality Checklist
Before delivering output, verify:
- [ ] Every country in the input list has a complete six-block profile
- [ ] Each profile includes a numeric annual leave figure, public holiday count, and approximate employer contribution rate
- [ ] The comparison matrix includes all countries as rows with every column populated
- [ ] Each country lists exactly 3 compliance risks, each with a mitigation
- [ ] 13th-month, severance, and threshold traps are explicitly addressed (Y/N or specifics), not omitted
- [ ] A disclaimer that rates change frequently and local counsel should confirm appears at least once
Notes
- Statutory rates and thresholds change annually — treat all figures as directional and instruct the buyer to confirm current-year values with local counsel or their EOR before contracting
- The employment model materially changes who owns compliance: under an EOR, the provider carries much statutory liability, but the buyer still owns benefits competitiveness and tax treatment of supplementary perks
- The highest-value output for most teams is the comparison matrix plus the prioritized action list — it converts a vague "we want to hire globally" into a sequenced, budgetable plan
- When headcount is near a known threshold (works councils, mandatory bonuses), call it out explicitly — these are the obligations most commonly missed during rapid expansion
How to use this skill
This file is a Claude Code skill in Anthropic's standard format — markdown with YAML frontmatter at the top.
Installing in Claude Code:
~/.claude/skills/<folder-name>/SKILL.md— auto-loads in every session anywhere on your machine (recommended for skills you'll use across multiple projects)<your-project>/.claude/skills/<folder-name>/SKILL.md— auto-loads only when working in that project (recommended for project-specific skills)
Restart Claude Code or open a new session to register.
Using in Claude.ai, ChatGPT, Gemini, or other AI tools:
- Drag this file into a new chat, or copy and paste its contents
- Send your task or request as your next message — the AI will apply the skill where it fits
For Claude Code skill details: https://docs.anthropic.com/en/docs/claude-code/skills